Your evaluation paragraph is what separates a 5 from a 7 in Econ Paper 1. Most students describe → explain → stop. But evaluative thinking is what examiners reward.
IB evaluators want you to take a position.
Example:
"While an indirect tax can reduce negative externalities, its effectiveness depends on the price elasticity of demand."
This tells the examiner:
✅ You understand complexity
✅ You're not describing
✅ You're evaluating
A high-scoring evaluation always covers:
What works well?
Who benefits?
What could go wrong?
What are the limitations?
The most underrated part of evaluation.
Examiners LOVE conditionality:
PED/YED
Government efficiency
Time horizon
Size of tax/subsidy
Market structure
A short, relevant example boosts credibility instantly.
Example:
"Mexico's sugar tax reduced soda consumption but had limited impact on low-income groups."
Short. Real. Effective.
Tie it together in one line.
Example:
"Therefore, while the tax can reduce consumption, its long-term success depends on complementary policies such as public education."
This shows maturity of economic thinking.
📲 Get started with StudyIB to access full evaluation structures
💬 Share Econ questions with peers on Discord
